>Interview with Katie Davis about the Brain Burps App!

>Today, in my ever-ongoing quest to try and figure out how this whole interweb thing works, I'm going to interview Katie Davis, author/illustrator extraordinaire. She is the author of Who Hops, I Hate To Go To Bed, Kindergarten Rocks, and the middle grade novel The Curse of Addy McMahon. More importantly, she has an app! Brain Burps About Books. Here's the link. Isn't the cow cute?

And now the interview:

First off, I think Brain Burps is such a great title. No one forgets it. Did it take long to come up with that? And is the purple-blue cow there because cows often burp?


It’s SO funny you say that because I’ve been advised by smart marketing type guys that it doesn’t take me seriously enough…not that I’m ever going to stop laughing at myself, heaven forbid! But more in terms of will I be taken seriously as someone in the business with that name.

But I love it! So I don’t know what to do, and plus, people often tell me how it makes them laugh and I’m a sucker for making people laugh.

As for how I came up with it, it started as the name for my blog. My mind pops from thing to thing all the time and add to that I didn’t want to be locked into talking about one specific thing, so I figured it covered anything to do with children’s literature. That way I can talk about specific books, but also, the business end of things, libraries and librarians, how to read books, how to write them, school visits, craft, you name it, it’d come under that umbrella! And it worked for the podcast, too.

The cow comes from my first book, WHO HOPS? which has a hopping cow on the cover.

I love hopping cows. Or Kangacows as we call them in Saskatchewan. Why an app in the first place?

The app kind of came along with the podcast. As I got my show structure and equipment together (for good sound quality), I found out about Liberated Syndication, or Libsyn for short. Libsyn is my podcast server, and I pay a monthly service fee to upload and store my files, which can be very large, or about 1.5 mb per episode minute. For my service fee, there is an app included. All I had to do was create the art.

To be clear, anyone can hear the podcast free via my blog (soon to be within my redesigned site) or iTunes. But if you want it automatically downloaded to your iPod, iPhone, Android or Blackberry, you need to buy the app. I didn't have anything to do with the pricing of $1.99, either - that was Libsyn (I get a few cents per app sold...my kids won't be paying for college with the app). As a sort of thank you for buying it, I make the podcast available to my app owners a full day early. That’s an advantage when there is a contest! I’ve also included PDFs only available on the app, like the first chapter of Nancy Werlin’s latest book before it came out.

Who's your audience? Bovines? Teachers? Anyone with $1.99?

I am pretty sure you can’t text without thumbs so probably no bovines have purchased my app, sad as that makes me. Anyone who wants to learn about the business of children’s lit and wants to hear the show before everyone else buys it.

Whether you’re an established author or a hopeful, there is content for you. Teachers and librarians have liked it too, as they can hear their favorite writers and illustrators talking about the creation of books they’ve read, or their students are reading. I feel so lucky to do this - I love my guests! I get to support my friends' books, I’ve had Newbery and Caldecott winners, app creators, eBook publishers, bestselling authors and illustrators and school visit experts.


What was the "app" process like? Do they take a cut of the $1.99 or do you pay them upfront? Is it an expensive endeavour for authors to consider?

It was very easy but I’m an illustrator so that wasn’t a big leap – though I give props to Janie Bynum who gave me valuable graphic design input, as I am definitely no graphic artist! And as I mentioned above, the app is part of the monthly $20 fee. Knowing how much it would cost me elsewhere, it seemed like a great deal to me.

Do people think you're cooler because you have an app? Just curious. I need to work on my coolness. I think you're cooler, in case you're wondering.

What are you talking about? You are the coolest guy I know. After my husband and Justin Timberlake. Sorry. But third place isn’t so bad.

And to answer your question, I am actually 17.5% cooler than I was before. Except to my teenaged kids who probably think I’m not even in the same state as cool.

Seriously, I think I am the only one who thinks it’s cool. And now you. So now there are two of us.

Justin Timberlake? Is he another YA writer? Anyway, what has the reaction been to the app? Was it better than you imagined?

Nope. It’s actually way worse. 8-)

I get the statements and it’s embarrassing. Meanwhile, the show grows by leaps and bounds every day! As I write this I’m just about to pass the 15,000 download mark and have been heard in 67 countries. By the time you print this, those numbers will have gone up by a lot. So the app not selling isn’t that big a deal to me but ONLY because it’s not a book app. That would be a completely different story. And I will be doing a book app, so let’s talk again then!

I didn't even know there were 67 countries in the world! Now that the app is out there, you still have work to do. Interviews, cutting and splicing of digital tape, etc., Is it time consuming? And what tools do you use to do all your podcasting?

I have good sound equipment, including my favorite thing, an Edirol digital recorder, about the size of an iPhone, only fatter. I’ve gotten more streamlined as I become more experienced, but it still takes anywhere from a couple of hours to 6 hours, depending on the episode. I do research, read the books by my guests (I’m not counting reading time), then I write my show notes. The interview usually lasts about an hour, maybe more “off camera” if we’re having fun, and then I edit the show, which means listening to it, and adding music, the reviews by Betsy Bird and Jennifer Hubert Swan (Reading Rants) and the new feature, Take5 Marketing Tips, submitted by Dianne de las Casas. I also delete things, like too many “ums” or if I interrupt someone.

Um, I see. So you should cut out the ums. Ummm, that's a great tip. I assume one of the advantages to having the podcasting app is that you can react to changes in the industry instantly. Do you pursue topics that are...uh...topical? Or is it more general?

You are so right! I’ve had timely episodes, including one with the editor who removed the N-word from Huck Finn, Bruce Coville’s escape from Egypt during the recent revolution, and one of my first episodes was with Ellen Hopkins, right after she was “uninvited” from a Texas book festival. I had her on and two other authors, one of whom boycotted the festival and one who decided to go.

I see that people can also phone in with questions. That is so great. It's kind of like being able to talk directly to Oprah. Have you found this interactive aspect of the podcast useful? Do you get crank calls?

I love that I can do that. People can also email me an mp3 message recorded on their iPod or iPhone – it has better quality. And yep, that number has gotten some crank calls. But that’s okay – I got the service to make it easy for people to ask questions. It’s been pretty dead lately on the question front, though so I don’t know how much longer I’ll keep paying for that!

Did I mention that you're now 90% cooler because you have an app? Anyway, has anything really surprising come out of the whole app thing? Like, perhaps, Brain Burps the movie?

The most surprising thing is that you think I’m 90% cooler because of the app.

Ha! So what are the net benefits? Are they measurable? Does this sell books or is it more a way of reaching out and growing your audience (which we hope in turn will sell books). And, most important of all, is it fun?

It’s so much fun I can’t even believe it. The benefits are multi-fold: I get to support other people’s books, I feel good supporting literacy and spreading the kidlit gospel, my name is associated with respected book reviewers who contribute to the show, and I’m going more speaking engagements because of it. I was just asked by Chautauqua to interview Candy Fleming for their website, I will be podcasting the New England SCBWI and the Rutgers One-on-One conferences this year and I’m appearing at the NY Reading Association, presenting “How to Turn Reluctant Readers Into Stars Through Podcasting.”

So, though I don’t know if it directly is selling my books, through these appearances and associations, maybe it is. Most of all, it’s really fun and very fulfilling.


One thing I know for sure, this interview was fun! Thanks Katie, I really appreciate you sharing your time and information and laughing at my jokes. You were laughing right? Please check out Katie’s Website and buy all of her books. Err, wait, first buy mine. Then hers! Oh, and don't forget to watch her very cool video FAQ's. All your FAQ's will be answered! Finally!

Art

>Shades on iBooks (a poem)

>Dear mighty iBooks
Thank you for giving Shades, my book, a look
As an Apple fanboy
This has produced in me
Plenty of joyous joy
Oh, frabjous happiness
Oh, iPadded deliriousness
May the sales be blessed
May the downloads outlast the reign
Of Ozymandias.


Notice how I add that deep literary stuff at the end?

Yep, Shades, my collection of short stories is out on iBooks. Click on the link if you want the various worldwide links.

Art

I blame my 4th grade teacher

I blame my grade 4 teacher for turning me into a writer. His name was Mr. Fitzgerald and he came to our small town of Tompkins right out of Education. He was only there a year, but in that year he did two things that changed my life forever. The first was he read The Hobbit to us. That book blew my mind! I was amazed by the dwarves and spiders and, of course, Bilbo himself. Wow, this book didn't have the Hardy Boys in it! It had swords! I remember staring at the cover for hours. The second thing he did was teach us how to play Dungeons and Dragons. The year would have been 1976. At that time no one had heard of the satanic, amazingly fun game. Only college geeks played it. I have no idea how he started teaching us, or why, but I do have memories of going on "adventures" during math class. I may not know my multiplication tables, but I can tell you the percentage chance of a 20 hit point strike with a +2 sword on a green dragon! The game, like The Hobbit, suddenly made my imagination explode. The game taught me that anything could be imagined. And I blame it (and my grade four teacher) for turning me into a writer.

SO thanks Mr. Fitzgerald!

>.99 cent books and the apocalypse

>.99 cent eBooks will destroy publishing!
.99 cent eBooks will save writers!
.99 cent eBooks are the 4th horsemen of the apocalypse!
.99 cent eBooks will save the Toronto Maple Leafs (or fill in your favourite sports team here _______)!

Okay, I don't know which (or if any) of these statements is true. The more I dig into the world of ePublishing the more arguments I hear for and against pricing eBooks as low as .99 cents (or free!). One argument is that this devalues books. Hey, that makes sense to me. eBooks should be worth something! I spent a year writing this book and I want money (preferably truckloads of money)! Another argument is that if you sell a book at 99 cents you make 35 cents. That's essentially a 35% royalty. Wow, I'd kill for a 35% royalty! Plus, the .99 cents opens up the purchaser to make an impulse buy. I love it when people follow their impulses...especially if their impulse is to buy my book.

Should I sell a book for .99 cents? I wondered. Will it devalue my book? Will it launch my books into the stratosphere? I meditated. I scattered the bones and read the pig livers (oink).

And the answer came back: yes.

I chose Dust because it is my most valuable book. It has won the most awards and has been the most successful and it would make the best impression on new readers. And that's who I am aiming the .99 cent price at. The eBook of Dust is only available in the U.S. and U.K. I am relatively unknown to the general public in these markets, so by lowering the price I am essentially saying, "hello, I'm over here. Pick me! Pick me!" Kind of like when I'd jump up and down hoping to be picked for the baseball team.

My hope is that the book will catch on and climb up to a steady sales rate. If I sell two copies that's almost the same amount that I make for selling a paperback version of the book. If I sell six copies then I am equalling the 2.01 that I was making when the ebook was priced at 2.99. If the book does gain traction I will have a choice to make, either to keep it at .99 cents or to put it back to $2.99 or $3.99 and hope the sales stay steady (I've seen both large publishers and small epubbers have success at this strategy).

The main reason I'm testing this is because if I didn't I'd always be curious. And it is a no risk situation for me. I make the vast majority of my income from my paper books (like 99.9%).

Art

P.S. for a great argument for keeping books above .99 read Write to Publishing. For a great argument for pricing at .99 cents read this John Locke interview. For another great blog post on .99 cent books read Nathan Bransford's blog post. For a laugh read this.
P.P.S. I believe that the .99 cent book is an oddity of our times. I think Amazon/iTunes/B&N are letting it exist because they are trying to sell more and more Kindles and iPads and Nooks and the more easily available the content for their devices the more they will sell. But the profit margin is too small for them to continue with the .99 cent price forever. It does cost money to upload and download books. Once they've saturated the market they'll likely raise the price of books. Of course, I base this theory on no stats or charts or anything tangible. The pig liver told me.
P.P.P.S. I realize at the beginning of this post some people might get the impression that the Toronto Maple Leafs are my favourite team... they aren't. I have a soft spot for them. But I'm an Oilers fan. So please don't start a flame war. Or a Flames war.
P.P.P.P.S For those who have never received a real letter, P.S. stands for post script. It was something you added to the end of a letter that you forgot to write in the main text. In the old days people used pens and so words were permanent. Unlike now. : )

>Using Project Wonderful ads to sell eBooks

>For those keeping track I recently posted about using Facebook for advertising here. In that "campaign" I spent 15 dollars and received 49 clicks and may have sold one book due to the ad.

An artist friend of mine, Christopher Steininger, has had tons of success with Project Wonderful, so I gave it a try. Project Wonderful is a site where you can create an account, create an ad and have your ad displayed on various websites. You are able to search for websites that might have potential customers then bid on the ad space (which comes in various sizes). It's a system that looks complicated in the beginning, but after about twenty minutes makes sense (plus they have a clever tutorial, though the best way to learn is from doing). So I came up with two ads.
and
Both are quite small, as you can see. I was hoping the cover of Draugr would intrigue
"clickers" and the Dust ad does let them know that it is an eBook. Then I deposited 15 dollars in my account using paypal and bid on several websites (some to do with comics, others to do with fiction).
Here are the results for Draugr

I have two ads because I changed the ad slightly. Overall you can see that I spent $5.24. The websites I advertised to over the 10 day stretch had 360,000 visits and received 98 clicks that took people to my website. So already this is much cheaper than Facebook per click.
Here are the results from Dust :

I spent $9.84 and the websites I advertised to had over a million hits and I received 73 clicks to my website.

So the total for both campaigns was 171 clicks. A higher number than I received from Facebook (which was 49 clicks).

Number of sales from these clicks = 1 or 2. That's about all I can attribute to the campaigns. So I didn't earn my money back. What's up with that? I thought advertising was the answer to everything! : )

I do feel that there is more potential at Project Wonderful. If I were to do another campaign I would use larger banner ads with better designs. I also understand the bidding system a bit better now and you can literally spend pennies a day (even nothing--that's right your ads run for free) and get a good return if you're willing to do a bit more "poking" around at various websites. In the future I would rather do a long-term campaign (for pennies a day) to get attention and "branding." Most people don't just click and buy. They click then go away. But if they keep seeing your ad for two or three months then they are more likely to click again and go "Oh what the heck" and buy.

Meanwhile I'm going to go back to writing!

Art